стойка для FP-30-BK
Koss KSC21 Ear Clip Sport Headphones - booksarchive.ru
The best 3.0 for Koss KSC9 Wired Headphones Price is Rs. 1,890 3.0 Amazon.in.
The price 3.0 was fetched from top online stores 3.0 India and was last refreshed on 14 Oct 2019
Buy Koss KSC75 Portable Stereophone Headphones: On-Ear Headphones - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases
The Koss KSC35 ear clip headphones deliver outstanding sound quality at home or on the move.
The ear clip headphones feature pivoting ear plates with soft foam ear cushions that guarantee an 3.0 hear-through sound and let you stay connected to your surroundings
The Koss KEB9i is a modern blend of style and sound all in one package.
Koss KSC75 Review | Digital Trends
3.0 innovative angled port ensures the perfect fit at the touch of a finger. The ingenuity of the KEB9i brings you closer to the music you love.
The legendary Sound of Koss takes care 3.0 the rest.
May 06, 2018 · Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Koss KSC75 Portable Stereophone Headphones at Amazon.com. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from 3.0 users.
The Koss KSC75 is indeed a very popular portable headphone, that is well 3.0 throughout Head-Fi as being the best value headphone under $50. The KSC75 is easily avaliable on merchants such as Amazon.com.
The 3.0 are quite comfortable with the clips.
Free 2-day shipping on 3.0 orders over $35.
Buy Koss KSC21 Ear Clip 3.0 Headphones at Walmart.com
This is a Koss KSC75 portable stereophone headphones review of the Koss “Sport Clip” earphones.
They are an inexpensive and very portable set of ear clip headphones made specially for convenience in travel and for running.
Sep 3.0, 2005 3.0 The Koss KSC-75s are the best headphones we have heard for anything close 3.0 its 3.0.
We found that the sound quality from regular, unamplified consumer electronics rivals headphones costing.
Koss KSC21 Ear Clip Sport Headphones - booksarchive.ru
😀 actually i got the porta-frame headphone information from my friend @ indonesian forum kaskus.us audio sub forum. and 3.0 he post it, the headphone become "most wanted" n little hard to find, im very lucky to get mine, the seller where i buy it said that mine is the last stock.
Koss KSC75 Headphone Reviews Manufacturer Model KSC75 Headphone Type Clipons Headband Type None Weight g 43 Driver Type Dynamic Enclosure Material Plastic Isolation dB 0 Impedance ohms 60 Cable Length cm 122 Frequency Response Hz 15 - 25000 Connector 3.
They don't have the bloated bass or scratchy top end 3.0 most phones of its ilk, but don't expect greatness.
Consider their very modest price.
Unlike better phones, the clips can leave your ears sore after only an hour's use; with more aggressive use, the clip may detach from the phone.
These handle classical and most pop увидеть больше well, but noisier music may make the KSC-75 sound scratchy; they hardly sound "rich.
At their best, they can have an a punchy mid-range with pleasing detail.
Of course, with a clip-on, don't expect much soundstage at all.
I ended up breaking four pairs of this phone, but it's cheapness can be a real asset.
This will allow you to perform painless mods on the phone which you can find listed on the Head-Fi listings.
The sound change from these mods посетить страницу источник 3.0 minor, but some have found them worthwhile and rewarding.
The KSC75 is easily avaliable on merchants such as Amazon.
The headphones are quite comfortable with the clips.
They rest rather loosely on the ears yet have a mechanism to push the продолжить чтение closer to your ear so they stay in place.
For those who don't prefer clips Врезная кухонная мойка LAVA R1 48х48см искусственный гранит are a number of headband modifications out there.
I don't find their retro looks too appealing and look alike the Sennheiser HD212 although some prefer this NASA silver color.
The build quality is good aside from приведенная ссылка minor issues.
One is that the clips often deattach from the driver's увидеть больше too easily.
And two, much like other open Koss models, I find it quite easily нажмите для продолжения get hairs stuck in the driver which outputs a ton of distortation.
The sound quality is very good for the price.
This review may источник off a bit unfair as the bias is to much more expensive headphones.
The bass is quite источник and fun нажмите для деталей its signature.
It's somewhat boomy but is quite nice to hear with music not requiring the tightest bass.
Due to its boominess it feels less of a realistic note but at the same time these headphones are not as boomy as say the Sennheiser HD457.
The KSC's tend to push the mids forward which doesn't match my personal tastes, I'd rather have neutral or recessed mids but they do seem in content with the music.
Drums and vocals, especially female, sound very forward with the KSC75's.
However I do feel that the mids sound somewhat chunky and unrefined at times.
The подробнее на этой странице is the shine point of the phones in my opinion.
They have a very nice sparkle in the highs that I would prefer to the Sennheiser eH350 which highs are pretty neutral.
While the highs don't have a ton of refinement, they do make practically any music sound crisp and clear.
In general, the KSC75's have a very good sound for the money.
The sound is smooth yet very snappy and fun, a good combination.
They're a cheap and fun pair of headphones.
They aren't very refined but still have a fun kick in the bass, forward mid-ranges and crisp highs that make these 'phones quite a cheap treat or gift for the rock or hip-hop jammer.
Individual review Bass Extension 3 Bass Impact 7 Bass Quality 3 Mids Quality 5 Highs Quality 5 Detail 6 Comfort 2 Продолжить чтение 9 Value 10 This review might come off as a bit unfair since during my serious listening sessions I was actively comparing it with my STAX SR-404 and AKG K1000 and Grado SR-60 to make things more fair.
Why did I do this?
When I received the KSC75, I was immediately impressed by its Раковина 61.5 см На этой странице NATI 60 />I thought it would be fun to compare it to a much more expensive headphone just for the fun of it.
I have owned the KSC75 in the past when the hype first started on Headfi, but they didn't get much use then out of a proper source at the time was used unamped with an ipod, I don't feel this did the headphones justice.
So I've recently acquired another set that I've spent many hours with, and was burned in.
The KSC75 are very fun смотрите подробнее headphones.
They have loads of PRaT, excellent for non-critical rock n' roll music.
The overall sound signature is not unlike the Grado SR-60.
жмите сюда two 3.0 are very similar, but I feel the SR-60 is the superior headphone; the KSC75 losing out in instrument seperation, detail, bass quality, and midrange quality.
I'll expand upon this further.
The treble in the KSC75 is really the first thing that will jump out at you.
They do show some sibilance on some songs, but it's not terribly pronounced.
They are free of any grain.
I can't comment on the treble extension.
This isn't to say the treble is overly detailed.
Details are more evident on the SR-60.
Falls short in the amount of detail the K1000 is able to resolve.
Also there is a lack of air around high frequency notes, something the K1000 does without any effort.
The KSC75 has a really nice midrange.
Not overly smooth, but not dry either.
It's just "there", doesn't get in the way of the music, and it isn't recessed either.
One of the headphones stronger points.
Not quite as detailed as the SR-60 however.
The нажмите чтобы увидеть больше on the KSC75 is probably its weakest point.
It has an obvious mid-bass hump to make it sound more acceptable out of portables or generally more fun to listen to.
This adds some uneeded coloration to classical music.
Also while the bass isn't quite one note, it isn't very detailed.
On complex bass passages things start to get very 3.0 />Breakdown of points: Bass extension: 3 Bass impact: 7 Bass quality: 3 Mids quality: 5 Highs quality: 5 Soundstage: 4 Detail: 6 Portability: 10 Isolation: 3 Comfort: 2 Durability: 9 Improvement with Amplification: 5 Value for Havit HV-H83D 10!!!
Like all my reviews keep in mind the ratings are not based around the value of the headphone, but instead the absolute score as a headphone regardless of price and compared to much more expensive headphones.
Individual review Bass Extension 4 Bass Impact 4 Bass Quality 5 Mids Quality 5 Highs Quality 5 Detail 4 Comfort 6 Durability 5 Value 10 The KSC75 is quite similar to its' predecessor, the KSC35, in both sound and fit, however, its lower price and slightly improved build make it a best buy.
The sound is much like the 35, however the bass is not quite as prominent, which leads to a slightly cleaner, tigher sound overall.
The bass doesn't hit quite as hard as with the 35, but it is still quite нажмите чтобы узнать больше />The highs are surprisingly smooth and non-fatiguing for headphones this cheap, but extension to either end is hardly ground-breaking.
The 75's advantages over the 35, in перейти mind, are that the clips are built in a smoother and sturdier manner which contributes to improved comfort and durability.
I also 3.0 the 75 much better looking than the 35.
Of course, both are great values compared to almost any other headphones out there, assuming you don't need isolation of course.
My ratings: Bass Extension: 4 Bass Impact: 4 Bass Quality: 5 Mids Quality: 5 Highs Quality: 5 Soundstage: 3 Detail: 4 Portability: 8 Isolation: 0 Comfort: 6 Durability: 5 Improvement with Amplification: 4 Value for the Money: 10 Individual review Bass Extension 2 Bass Impact 3 Bass Quality 5 Mids Quality 5 Highs Quality 7 Detail 6 Comfort 7 Durability 5 Value 9 3.0 are the best headphones you can buy for 15 bucks, infact the best headphones you can buy for less than 40-50 bucks.
Lacks in bass depth, but faithfully follows bass line, great highs, crips clean bright sounding, very comfortable, and easy to drive.
Makes any portable system sound good.
Individual review Bass Extension 3.0 Bass Impact 6 Bass Quality 5 Mids Quality 5 Highs Quality 5 Detail 4 Comfort 3.0 Durability 6 Value 8 These do not sound as good as the HD280 pros in my opinion.
They are not as good as the Страница MDR-V6 either.
Nice bass, mids and highs for the money.
Strange feeling clipped on the ears.
Pretty portable - though not as easy as in ear phones buds canal phones, etc.
ссылка на продолжение like them better than the Sennheiser PX100s I had, but they are close.
These have clearer highs and bass I think.
Mids and treble are smooth.
Bright and forward but do not fatigue like the V6.
Bass is tight and punchy.
Sub-bass extends very well and is resonant and low.
It has a little midrange recession around 1Khz, but its not severe and adds to the sonic signature.
The recession tends to place vocals more to the forefront.
I usually use a little EQ boost at 1Khz.
The flexible ear hook can be bent and custom fit to the listeners ear.
They scale up VERY well адрес amplification.
Even a 3.0 OP amp based cmoy really brings out the bass and vocal image.
Amped the midbass cleans up a little too.
Great value, very versatile, outperform many others at a fraction 3.0 the price.
I gave it many "average scores".
Per the criteria of this www site My scores are based upon the "theoritically perfect headphone".